I am late on this one, as I could have written about this way earlier. But I neglected to do so because it seemed to be just another good idea that will not work out—neither in the market place, nor technologically.
After this dark precursor on a very white device, the reMarkable paper tablet, let me start by pointing out that this is a device that comes close to fulfill my “Digital Assistant” “vision” I uttered in late 2009. In fact, it is the device that comes the closest of the countless devices I had for brief intervals of time (* = still have it):
- Apple iPad 2*, iPad Air, iPad Pro 12.9 + Apple Pencil
- Samsung Chromebook Plus
- ASUS VivoTab Note 8*
- ASUS Chromebook Flip C100P*, C101P*
- Tolino Tab 8*
- Lenovo ThinkPad X230 Tablet
- Barnes & Noble NOOK Simple Touch, NOOK Glowlight+*
- Tolino Shine
- Amazon Kindle DX*
If you have been following this blog, you may have noticed that I did only write about a few devices on that list. This has two reasons:
- Since I gave up the idea of becoming a tech journalist or analyst, I have been amazingly lazy in writing my thoughts down. Also I have been quite critical and whenever it felt like I had nothing to add, I did not finish nor publish my drafts.
- None of these devices got as close to that old DA idea as the reMarkable Tablet. Some just lacked the pen (all the eInk devices in the list, Tolino Tab and the Chromebooks Flip), others where just to heavy to feel good (Thinkpad X230T), and the remaining made me realize that reading and writing on an LCD screen is just not like reading or writing on paper (iPad Pro, Samsung Chromebook Plus). ((In addition to that I really did not like the industrial design of the Apple Pencil, it felt to heavy; and the Pen thing of the Chromebook Plus on the otherhand felt to flimsy, just like the keyboard and the overall feel of the device made me think that I would likely break it soon, which was why I sold it quickly. With the ASUS VivoTab Note 8 I can’t really say what the main issue is, as I have barely used it, and I used it with Ubuntu since the Windows install it came with was totally messed up. And while “xournal” is nice and all, it does not stand a chance against its proprietary competition, e.g. Microsoft OneNote.))
What’s so great about this?
Now why is the reMarkable better at replacing paper than all these aforementioned devices? That’s easy: It is so much closer to feeling like paper than everything else I have tried before. They nailed the experience, they did not only design a pen that feels great in the hand but one that keeps feeling great after you used it for hours. Sure, you don’t have colors, but actually, that can make things easier. ((No matter what color I chose on the Samsung Chromebook Plus, it felt slightly wrong to my eye and Apples Notes App on the iPad Pro did only slightly better.)) And: While I hated my handwriting on the Apple and Samsung devices, I am just as ok with it on the reMarkable paper tablet as I am on actual paper. ((I know: I am vain, and this is my vanity speaking. But, ask yourself and think carefully before you dismiss this.))
If you are curious about the specs, you may scroll down to the bottom now. As this is not a device that wants to be your computer, what matters is, that the experience is alright. For writing, I did not notice anything being slow yet. With PDFs, the reMarkable tablet sometimes has to think a little before displaying the next page after you hit the button, especially if there are high resolution images on the page—but there are horrible PDFs out there and lean ones do work just fine. There also have been complaints that the annotation format reMarkable came up with is not perfect. As the reMarkable can also be used to read .epub (it does not support DRM), ((So you either have to restrict yourself to DRM free eBooks, or liberate your books from DRM hell, which unfortunately is illegal in most of the western countries.)) some users have been reporting problems with certain epub files. I will expand this section as I find out more.
Summary: The reMarkable is an ok reader, and if you have your personal PDF and epub toolchain anyway because you had to fix similar problems for other ereaders, you will be fine, but be aware that a tech illiterate relative may need your help from time to time.
The bad stuff
Cloud. reMarkable chose to make this a “cloud” dependend device. Just like the devices interface comes with a Qt 5 based interface, to upload content to your reMarkable you are supposed to use their software, which is build with Qt 5 and is available for Mac, Windows, Android and iOS. For desktop GNU/Linux, there is some .deb file on the web, but it is not a supported platform, which is sad but understandable given the plethora of linux distributions out there and the market share of all these combined.
Now why do I consider it bad to have this device be cloud-depending? In fact, it is a feature that has some value: Not only are your notes being backed up whenever your reMarkable paper tablet connects to a Wireless LAN it knows, you can then access all your synced notes on your phone or computer. That is definitively a feature, and I bet a majority of potential buyers appreciate it.
But as I am slightly paranoid and given that most of the processes on the reMarkable paper tablet seem to run as root, I worry about their security practices in general. ((On the other hand, this makes the reMarkable easily hackable, which to me is a huge point in its favor.)) Also, I don’t want to upload my thoughts to the NSA, GCHQ or some comparable agency. In order to allow the reMarkable to become an extension of my brain, I therefore went ahead and removed the Cloud service and disabled WiFi. I can still access my notes over USB (they provide a web interface and you can SSH into your reMarkable paper tablet easily). Getting PDFs on the remarkable works using a shell script.
Price. Boy, is that thing expensive. EUR, USD 499 is the current price (a limited time offer, afterwards it’ll be USD 599), not including the folio (which is a great addition, but adds another EUR, USD 79 to your bill). Now while the new iPad (2018) + Apple Pencil will cost you less and be more versatile, I would not want to swap my reMarkable paper tablet for that. Also, if you compare it to other eInk devices with 10″ or larger screens, the reMarkables price is certainly comparable. Unfortunately, devices like the larger Sony DP-RP1 pack better CPUs, which makes them quicker at those PDF documents—still, a direct comparison is hard, as there (at least to my knowledge) is no other device that matches the reMarkable paper tablets features bit by bit.
If you want a device that is the closest to paper to replace paper, this should be one of, if not the best, option. Should you buy one? Honestly I don’t know. But I know I don’t regret having bought it one bit. I just love it.
Specifications: ((Source, augmented on my own.))
Size and weight:
- 177 x 256 x 6.7mm (6.9 x 10.1 x .26 inches)
- 350 gram (.77 pounds)
- 10.3” monochrome digital paper display (black and white)
- 1872×1404 resolution (226 DPI)
- Partially powered by E Ink Carta technology
- Multi-point capacitive touch
- No glass parts, virtually unbreakable
- Paper-like surface friction
- Palm rejection
Storage and RAM
- 8 GB internal storage (6.5 GBs free, which should amount to 100.000 pages of notes according to reMarkable)
- 512 MB DDR3L RAM
1 GHz ARM A9 CPU (NXP/Freescale i.MX6 SoloLite)
- Rechargeable (Micro USB)
- 3000 mAh (non user replacable)
Codex, a custom Linux-based OS optimized for low-latency e-paper.
Linux remarkable 4.1.28-fslc+g7f82abb #1 Tue Nov 21 19:03:42 CET 2017 armv7l GNU/Linux, busybox, systemd, Qt 5.9 for GUI, pdfium
- WLan/WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n (BCM 4330)